Four steps. One month. Measured.
A working session every two weeks, short check-ins in between, and a before-and-after report at the end. No sprints, no ceremonies.
Assess
A baseline and a readiness score for the processes in scope.
Redesign
A new process map: agents draft, evidence is automated, people approve intent.
Enable
Working tools, and people trained on their own work.
Measure
A before/after report and the next priorities.
Your numbers, not our promises.
- Time from request to delivery
- Time work waits for review or approval
- Hours of manual effort per task
- Rework or error rate
We record the baseline in week one and measure the same things at the end of the month.
Stop checking lines of code. Verify the intent.
When agents write the code, reading every diff becomes the new bottleneck. People approve what the work should do; evidence shows that it does.
Read the diff
- Line-by-line code review
- Trust built by re-reading
- Every change waits for a reviewer
Verify the intent
- Does the code and its tests express the intended behavior?
- Trust built from specs, benchmarks and automated tests
- People decide; evidence is generated with every change
Humans approve intent.
Reviewers check that code and tests express the intended behavior, as written in the spec. They stop checking lines of code.
Confidence comes from evidence.
Design specs, benchmarks and automated tests establish trust, not reading diffs. Every change arrives with its proof.
Sprints were built to pace human work. When agents draft in minutes, the bottleneck is approving intent, and evidence makes that fast. So we plan by outcomes, not two-week boxes.
Working sessions every two weeks, short check-ins in between, and a before-and-after report at the end of the month.
Find your bottleneck in 5 minutes.
Twelve questions, a score from 0 to 36, and a clear first step.
